Offerings

Custom solutions, built to your requirements

Every engagement is different, but they tend to fall into three shapes. Most clients start with one and end up using all three.

Consulting

We map the problem, weigh the trade-offs, and produce a plan you can actually budget and staff.

Before a line of code gets written, someone has to ask the right questions. We work with your team to map the problem, weigh the trade-offs, and produce a plan you can actually budget and staff — including the option where you do not build it at all.

What this includes

Architecture review and system design
Technology selection and vendor evaluation
Codebase audits and technical debt assessment
Legacy system modernization roadmaps
Technical due diligence
Team process and CI/CD maturity reviews

Good fit if: You have a decision to make and want an outside engineer's read before committing budget to it.

Development

We build production software and hand it over in a state you would be comfortable inheriting.

The code is tested, the setup is documented, the build is automated, and nothing important lives only in someone’s head. We build in Python, TypeScript, C#/.NET, Go, and Rust, choosing the tools that fit the problem rather than forcing every project into one stack.

What this includes

Backend services, APIs, and microservices
Full-stack web applications
Desktop and command-line tooling
System integrations, data pipelines, and ETL
Industrial and IoT software
Database design, migration, and optimization

Good fit if: You need something built, and you would like it to still be maintainable in three years.

Support & Automation

We set up the automation that keeps a system healthy and stay available when it needs a human.

The work does not end at delivery. We use GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Woodpecker, Azure DevOps, Ansible, Terraform, and Docker to make releases repeatable and infrastructure understandable.

What this includes

CI/CD pipeline design
Infrastructure as code
Unit, integration, end-to-end, and load testing
Monitoring, logging, and alerting
Ongoing maintenance and security patching
Developer environment and tooling improvements

Good fit if: Your team spends more time on releases and firefighting than on building.

Engagement models

How we structure work

Project-based

A defined scope, a fixed deliverable, and a schedule. Best when the requirements are clear enough to write down.

Retained capacity

A recurring block of engineering time each month. Best for ongoing development, maintenance, and the steady stream of work that doesn't fit into discrete projects.

Advisory

Scheduled time for architecture review, code review, and technical decisions. Best when your team is capable and just needs a second opinion from someone who's done it before.

Next step

Not sure which one you need?

That is a normal place to start. Describe the situation and we will tell you what we recommend, including when the answer is "you do not need us for this."

Email [email protected]